Lusky Rants
http://blog.lusky.com
Lusky Rants (and Blogs)

TEN IMPORTANT THINGS ABOUT YOUR CASE


    Some questions come up more often than others.  After much thought and consideration, I decided to make a list of the what I thought may be the ten most important things my clients should know about their bankruptcy.  This list may change from time to time but here they are.

TEN IMPORTANT THINGS ABOUT YOUR CASE

    1. You have to be honest. Schedules are filed under oath. The penalty for lying can be up to 5 years in the pen. We will not visit you.

    2. You must cooperate with us and timely provide all requested information and attend all scheduled meetings. If you are too busy to assist us, we will not be able to help you.

    3. The petition starts the case. It and other documents require your signature. These are formal documents and not the worksheets that we have you fill out. Without your original signature on the formal documents, we cannot file them. Therefore, if you have not signed the formal documents, your case has not been filed even if you have deposited a payment with us.

    4. Things can happen fast in bankruptcy cases. Make sure that we know how to reach you at all times and return calls as soon as possible.

    5. You must take a credit counseling course both BEFORE and AFTER your case is filed. That’s right, there are two of them. You cannot file without the first and you do not get your discharge without the second.

    6. Some transactions can be undone in bankruptcy.

        a.  If you transfer something to someone else and get little or nothing in return, a bankruptcy trustee can sue the person you transferred it to. Also you may not be able to get a discharge if the Court thinks you tried to hide the asset from creditors. Worse, you can go to jail if the Court thinks you tried to hide assets from the trustee.

        b.  If you repay a loan from a relative within one year of bankruptcy, that relative may be sued by the bankruptcy trustee. If you repay any other creditor within 90 days of filing bankruptcy, that creditor may be sued by the bankruptcy trustee.  Although the creditor may have to give the funds back to the trustee, you do not get in trouble for paying your legitimate debts.

    7. Your bankruptcy discharge only discharges you. It does not apply to any debt that your spouse may have signed for. However, Texas is a “community property” state; not a “community debt” state. If your wife did not sign, she is generally not liable for your debts. On the other hand, we generally charge no more handle a husband and wife case than just one spouse if they are filed as a joint case.

    8. Some debts are not dischargeable. The most notable ones are:

        a. Child support and alimony;

        b. Student loans;
        
        c. Most (but not all) taxes;

        d. Debts incurred through fraud. A common example is a “run up” of a credit card in the months prior to filing bankruptcy.

    9. Please feel free to call if you have any questions about your case. If we cannot take the call immediately, your call will be returned. However, generally multiple calls a day are not acceptable. Please try to accumulate your questions so that we can answer them all at once. That way, we will have time to answer our other clients’ questions as well. Email is also good. Email to mail@lusky.com comes to the entire staff.

10. You can follow your case and get copies of all filed documents on PACER. You must register at http://www.pacer.gov/reg_pacer.html. The cost is currently $0.08 per page (up to a maximum of $3.20 per document) but if you spend less than $10.00 per quarter, it is usually free.

Debtors Need Not Apply (at least in Texas)

On March 4, 2011, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Texas) decided the case of In the Matter of Burnett v. Stewart Title, Inc.  

Although Section 525 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that employers may not discriminate against debtors because they filed bankruptcy, the Court held that this does not apply to a private employer who is considering hiring a new employee.  Apparently, however, it still means that a private employer can not fire or otherwise discriminate against an existing employee solely because he or she filed bankruptcy.

Further the language is still clear that a governmental employer may not discriminate against an existing or contemplated employee solely because he or she filed bankruptcy.

CONFIDENTIALITY AND THE “THIRD PARTY RULE”

Most clients expect that their conversations with their lawyer are confidential and cannot be compelled to be disclosed.  This is known as the “attorney-client privilege.”  While the privilege generally applies to conversations between the attorney and client, there are exceptions.

One of the most common exceptions is the “Third Party Rule.”  Many clients will want to meet with their attorney with their best friend or family member present.  Unless that third party is a husband or wife, the presence of the third party may destroy the privilege.  That means that both the attorney and the client could be required to disclose the content of the conversation.  Therefore, if you are going to discuss matters of a sensitive nature, you should ask your friend to wait outside.

While this exception exists, it may not be that important in a bankruptcy context.  Most of what you will discuss will be in preparation of the documents that will be filed in the bankruptcy court.  These documents are filed under oath and are a public record.  Your attorney will advise you to tell the complete truth in these documents and should not assist you in falsifying them.  To do so would subject both you and your attorney to criminal penalties of up to five years in prison.  It would also trigger another exception to the attorney-client privilege known as the “Crime-Fraud Exception.”  Conversations with your attorney to commit or plan a crime or fraud are not protected.

With all of the above in mind, I usually tell my clients that unless they are going to confess to being an ax-murderer, it will probably be ok for their friend to attend.  However, they must understand that while I will not willfully volunteer any information about the conversation, I can be compelled to do so.

If you have any questions about the confidentially of your meetings with your attorney, please discuss it in private.

Credit Card Numbers Decoded

Ever wonder what the numbers on a credit card mean?  Well, here it is —

Credit cards usually consist of 16 digits. xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx.

The first digit is the Major Industry Identifier.
1 and 2 are airlines
3 is travel and entertainment
4 and 5 are banking and financial
6 is merchandising and banking
7 is petroleum
8 is telecommunications, and
9 is National Assignment

The first 6 digits are the issuer identification number. Cards can be looked up by this number.  For example —
4xxxxx is Visa
51xxxx through 55xxxx is Mastercard

The 7th and following digits except the last digit are the person's account number.

The final digit is a checksum.  It is used to validate the card number using an algorithm





Discharge Taxes in Bankruptcy?

Often, my clients are surprised to find out that some taxes are dischargeable in bankruptcy.  Generally income taxes are dischargeable if they meet certain time or age limits.

  1. They must be for a tax year for which the return was due more than 3 years prior to filing bankruptcy.  Example:  Today is March 11, 2011.  Taxes for the year 2007 were last due on April 15 or October 15 (extension date), 2008.  Therefore they meet this timeline.
  2. The tax return must have been actually filed by the debtor and have been on file with the IRS for at least 2 years.
  3. Any assessment the IRS makes must be at least 240 days old plus any time an offer in compromise was outstanding.
  4. These times may be extended for any period in which the debtor was previously in bankruptcy.

Some taxes are simply not dischargeable — for example, taxes assessed against you for taxes you withheld from your employees.

A NOTE ABOUT LIENS.  If the IRS or other taxing authority has filed a lien, the property to which the lien attached (e.g. your homestead) may not be discharged even if you are.  That means that the IRS or other taxing authority may take the collateral even if they could not take anything else from you.

Be sure to talk to your lawyer about taxes.

 

.

Can Collective Union Action Force Mortgage Modifications?

Below is an interesting article written by Peter Orville, Attorney at Law · Posted in *Bankruptcy Basics,*Chapter 13 Bankruptcy,Foreclosure News

Congress has been unable to pass any legislation that would allow for effective modification of mortgages. And the HAMP program is failing miserably.  Two New York unions, however, have come up with the idea that collective action through the market may get the needed results. The heads of the Transport Union Workers and the United Federation of Teachers in New York are urging their pension fund trustees to sell stocks and bonds invested in JPMorgan Chase (“Chase”) if the company does not do more to modify the mortgages of struggling homeowners.

The two unions combined have approximately $311 million invested in Chase, so the threat to pull the money out is not a hollow one. Legislation has been proposed in the recent past that would have allowed for modification of home mortgages in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, but those bills were killed before their passage largely due to intense lobbying on the part of the mega-banks. Struggling homeowners do comprise a collective group, though they lack the necessary organization to promote their interests, especially when matched against the large and well funded lobbying groups for mortgage holders and realtors.  The rather novel notion of the unions here is that the needed organization is already present and when that organization is combined with sincere market pressure, it may prove enough to get the necessary results.

Individual homeowners simply do not have the requisite power to force these mortgage holding behemoths to modify their mortgages. However, when individual homeowners are aligned in a collective group coupled with a market incentive for the mortgage holders to act, modification seems a much more attainable goal. Perhaps other unions with such pension investments will get on board for collective action. The “union collectives” may have the necessary size to make an impact through the market that government has proved unwilling or unable to achieve.


Growing Number of Public Officials to Slow Down Process

The Washington Post has reported that frustrated by the banks' response to the foreclosure mess, a growing number of public officials - including chief judges, attorneys general and sheriffs from jurisdictions big and small - are pushing the boundaries of their powers to slow down foreclosures in their areas, the Washington Post reported today. The new challenges are throwing a wrench into the plans of mortgage companies, which in recent weeks have tried to put the robo-signing mess behind them by rapidly reviewing or fixing their paperwork and resuming foreclosures. Such challenges, experts say, are likely to further prolong a foreclosure process that already takes an average of 16 months to complete - helping homeowners facing eviction but hurting the still-fragile housing market. Link to Washington Post Article .

Good News For A Change

Yesterday, August 26, 2010, the NY Times reported that American taxpayers could reap a sizable profit from the Obama administration's so called Public-Private Investment Program.  This is part of the administration's plan to unlock frozen credit markets made in the spring of 2009.  Now nine months into the program, there has been generated an estimated return of about 15.5% for the taxpayers.  Not too shabby for a program that critics called another giveaway to big business.

NEW RESTRICTIONS ON DEBT SETTLEMENT COMPANIES -- BUT THERE ARE LOOPHOLES

On July 29, 2010, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced new regulations  on debt settlement companies.  The rules will not take affect until the fall.  They will prohibit companies from charging a fee before the settle or reduce the customer's debt.  They also require that the companies set up dedicated or trust accounts for debt relief payments and disclose to their customers how long the debt-reduction efforts will take, what they will cost, and the potentially negative consequences that could occur.

There may be some loopholes.  For instance, the rules may only apply to telephone solicitation and not to internet solicitation or face-to-face meetings.

It was reported that over 20 states have sought legal action against debt-relief companies.  Some states, such as Texas, have no official regulation although the Texas Attorney General has pursued some companies.  THE SCAMS ARE STILL THERE.  Before using a debt-relief company, you should do your homework.  In addition to internet searches, you may be able to check with your attorney general's consumer protection office, the FTC, or your local United States Trustee's Office.

Contact an attorney if you have any doubts.  Many attorneys will offer a free initial consultation.  If in the Dallas, Texas area, please feel to contact us at 972-386-3900 for a free initial consultation to review your financial situation and review several options for relief.


The Best Congress Money Can Buy

Yep.  We have the best congress that money can buy.  The following is from the American Bankruptcy Institute.

Report: More Than 1,400 Former Lawmakers, Hill Staffers are Financial Lobbyists

A study released yesterday by Public Citizen and the Center for Responsive Politics found that more than 1,400 former members of Congress, Capitol Hill staffers or federal employees registered as lobbyists on behalf of the financial services sector since the start of 2009, the Washington Post reported yesterday. The analysis by two nonpartisan groups found that the "small army" of financial lobbyists included at least 73 former lawmakers and 148 ex-staffers connected to the House or Senate banking committees. More than 40 former Treasury Department employees also ply their trade as lobbyists for Wall Street firms, the study found. Some of the biggest names highlighted in the study include former Senate majority leaders Robert J. Dole (R-Kan.) and Trent Lott (R-Miss.); former House majority leaders Richard K. Armey (R-Texas) and Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.); and former House speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.). Ex-Rep. Vin Weber (R-Minn.) has the largest number of financial-services clients of any former lawmaker, representing 13 companies and groups, including Deloitte, Ernst & Young and the Real Estate Roundtable, the report shows.